One Storm, Three Narratives: A Literary Analysis of Rhetorical Devices in Mk 4:35–41; Mt 8:23–27; Lk 8:22–25
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21906/rbl.3790Keywords:
Synoptic Gospels, calming of the storm, literary analysis, rhetorical devicesAbstract
This study offers a comparative literary and rhetorical analysis of the Synoptic accounts of the calming of the storm (Mk 4:35–41; Mt 8:23–27; Lk 8:22–25), identifying both a shared narrative core and distinct redactional tendencies. Building on this synoptic comparison, the analysis of rhetorical devices demonstrates that these elements function as deliberate compositional strategies rather than mere stylistic features. It further shows that Mark preserves a vivid, Semitic-influenced style, Matthew presents a more concise theological account, and Luke develops a refined and rhetorically sophisticated narrative. In this way, each evangelist reshapes the inherited tradition to direct the reader’s understanding of Jesus’ identity and authority in accordance with particular theological aims and pastoral
concerns.
References
Achtemeier, P. (1975). The Lucan perspective on the miracles of Jesus. A preliminary sketch. Journal of Biblical Literature, 94(4), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.2307/3265436
Aus, R. (2000). The stilling of the storm studies in early Palestinian Judaic traditions. Global Publications.
Basta, P. (2020). From despair to faith. The stilling of the storm. Roczniki Kulturoznawcze, 11(3), 33–51.
Bovon, F. (1989). Das Evangelium nach Lukas (Lk 1,1–9,50). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Bullinger, E. (1898). Figures of speech used in the Bible. Eyre & Spottiswoode; E. & J. B. Young & Co.
Cranfield, C. (1959). The Gospel according to St. Mark. An introduction and commentary. Cambridge University Press.
Czerski, J. (1997). Metody interpretacji Nowego Testamentu (Opolska Biblioteka Teologiczna, 21). Wydział Teologiczny Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.
Davies, W., & Allison, C. (1991). A critical and exegetical commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew. T. & T. Clark.
Doriani, D. M. (2021). Matthew. In I. M. Duguid, J. M. Hamilton Jr. & J. Sklar (Eds.). Matthew–Luke (23–450; ESV Expository Commentary, 8). Crossway.
Feiler, P. (1983). The stilling of the storm in Matthew: A response to Günther Bornkamm. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 26(4), 399–406.
Fitzmyer, J. (1981). The Gospel according to Luke I–IX (Anchor Bible, 28). Doubleday.
Focant, C. (2015). Il Vangelo secondo Marco (Trans. C. Santambroglo). Cittadella Editrice.
Franklin, E. (2001). Luke. In J. Barton & J. Muddiman (Eds.). The Oxford Bible commentary (pp. 922–959). Oxford University Press.
Fuchs, A. (1993). Die „Seesturmperikope“ Mk 4,35–41 parr im Wandel der urkirchlichen Verkündigung. In G. Strecker (Ed.), Minor agreements: Symposium Göttingen 1991 (pp. 65–92). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Goodacre, M. (1996). Goulder and the Gospels. An examination of a new paradigm (Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series, 133). Sheffield Academic Press.
Gundry, R. (1994) Matthew. A commentary on his handbook for a mixed Church under persecution (2nd ed.). Eerdmans.
Hagner, D. (1993). Matthew 1–13 (Word Biblical Commentary, 33a). Word Books.
van Iersel, B. & Linmans, A. (1978). The storm on the lake, Mk 4:35–41 and Mt 8:18–27 in the light of form criticism, “Redaktionsgeschichte” and structural analysis. In T. Baarda, A. F. J. Klijn & W. C. van Unnik (Eds.), Miscellanea Neotestamentica: Studia ad Novum Testamentum praesertim pertinentia a sociis sodalicii Batavi C. N. Studiorum Novi Testamenti Conventus Anno MCMLXXVI quintum lustrum feliciter complentis suscepta (Vol. 2, pp. 17–48; Novum Testamentum Supplements, 48). Brill.
MacDonald, D. (2000). The Homeric epics and the Gospel of Mark. Yale University Press.
Neirynck, F. (1991). A Symposium on the minor agreements. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, 67(4), 361–372.
Neirynck, F. (1997). Goulder and the minor agreements. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, 73(1), 84–93.
Resseguie, J. (2005). Narrative criticism of the New Testament. An introduction. Baker Academic.
Schenk, W. (1993). Zur Frage einer vierten Version der Seesturm-Erzählung in einer Mt-Lk-Agreement-Redaktions-Schicht (DT-Mk). In G. Strecker (Ed.), Minor agreements: Symposium Göttingen 1991 (pp. 93–118). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Tuckett, C. (2001). Mark. In J. Barton & J. Muddiman (Eds.). The Oxford Bible commentary (pp. 886–922). Oxford University Press.
Vinson, R. B. (2008). Luke. Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary. Smyth & Helwys Publishing.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Tomasz Koszarek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License
that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
