Interpretation of the Revealed Word by the Tradition of the Church – the Issue of Subordination of Woman to Man in the Saint Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians (Eph 5 : 21–33)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21906/rbl.18Keywords:
Inspiration, tradition, man, woman, marriage, subordination, Letter to the Ephesians, PaulAbstract
The main objective of the present lecture is to provide, by the means of the Church tradition, the interpetation of a serious social problem which the Apostle Paul introduced in his letters, especially in the Letter to the Ephesians (Eph 5 : 21–33) – the issue of the subordination of woman to man.
The article has three parts:
1. Paul’s view on the suborditation of female to male in the historical circumstances of the first century of Christianity.
2. The view of the Church tradition on the relation between men and women from the post-apostolic era to the 21st century popes.
3. Concluding summary in the context of current views on the status of women in modern society.
In the first and principal part of the article we point to Paul’s understanding of the relationship of Christ and the Church which he himself describes as a great secret. Also the relationship of man and woman in marriage he considers a “mystery” that represents “mysterium salutis” (mystery of salvation) in the world. Paul judges human marriage in the context of Christ and the Church which means that it is an image of the covenant between God and the chosen people as well as the covenant between Jesus Christ and his Church. It is thus the image of “the new and eternal covenant”, i.e. the paschal one. With this reasoning (Eph 5 : 21–33) Paul refers to the mystical grandeur of marriage.
The issues of the subordination of woman to man based on the Christological and soteriological argument of the Letter to the Ephesians gains a new dimension – it is not about a superficial subordination of women, but about mutual subordination between husband and wife. Here we can see a brilliant illustration of mutual relations between spouses which are neither discriminatory nor egalitarian but complementary. They atribute to man and woman equality and equal dignity. At the same time, they atribute to them their own, specific, distinct and irreplaceable roles given to them by God.
Paul’s teaching about the subordination of woman to man had caused considerable problems in the tradition of the Church. The Holy Spirit, however, led her over the centuries and shifted understanding of the relationship between man and woman in marriage:
- from the unacceptable pagan and Judaic concepts that discriminate women,
- through the attitudes of the Church Fathers, which declared the same dignity of man and woman through the redemptive work of the Son of God; however, the value of women in the Church and society was not appreciated sufficiantly;
- to the ingenious doctrine of St. Pope John Paul II. in his theology of the body: the relationship between man and woman in marriage is a relationship of mutual subordination in love, reflecting God’s love and symbolizing the relation between Christ and the Church. This relationship is inherently “communio personarum” (communion of persons) in which the dissimilarity of women and men is mutually complemented and creates harmony.
In this article we wanted to highlight the fact that a return to the inspired biblical texts explained by the Magisterium is a reliable means of obtaining true knowledge even of the thorny issue of conjugal and family life.
References
Ambróu, Hexameron (Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, 32).
Bazil Veľký, Homilia in martyrium Julittam, [v:] Patrologia Graeca, vol. 31.
Benedikt XVI., Posolstvo Pápežskej biblickej komisii, http://www.tkkbs.sk/view.php?cisloclanku=20120423030.
Dolista J., Naděje vložená do manželství, Olomouc 1994.
Fabris R., Il matrimonio cristiano, [v:] A. Sacchi, Lettere Paoline e altre Lettere, vol. VI., Leumann-Torino 1996.
Fulla M., Antropológia ženy, Bratislava 2004.
Heriban J., Príručný lexikón biblických vied, Rím 1992.
Hieronym, Listy IV, 148, 25–27 (Celanzii).
Hoppe R., List Efezanům. List Kolosanům, Kostelní Vydří 2000.
Kasper W., Prejav pred kardinálskym konzistóriom 24.02.2014.
Klement Alexandrijský, Paedagogus (Corpus Christianorum Series Latina, 70).
Léon-Dufour X., Slovník biblickej teológie, Zagreb 1990.
Mattioli U., La tradizione nella „Mulieris dignitatem“, Genova 1991.
Paoli U. E., Vita romana, Milano 1982.
Pápežská biblická komisia, Inšpirácia a pravdivosť Svätého písma, 2014.
Pius XII., Príhovory mladomanželom.
Průvodce životem, Pavlův list do Efezu, Praha 1995.
Ravasi G., Lettere agli Efesini e ai Colossesi, Bologna 1994.
Stott J. R. V., Výklad epištoly Efežanům, Praha 1992.
Vood A. S., Ephesians, Grand Rapids, Michigan 1976 (The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, 11).
Weiser A., Die Frau im Umkreis Jesu und in den urchristlichen Gemeinden, [v:] H. Pissarek-Hudelist (Hrsg.), Die Frau in der Sicht der Anthropologie und Theologie, Düsseldorf 1989.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).