Hybrid Solidarity Arek Surabaya Solidarity Shift in the Post Reformation Era in Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21906/rbl.3685

Keywords:

Arek Surabaya, community, solidarity, transformation, Reformation Era

Abstract

This study tried to uncover solidarity shift of young people of Surabaya nicknamed “arek Surabaya” after the reformation era in Indonesia. The study was based on the assumption that solidarity is not static but dynamic. It is hypothesized that the solidarity has undergone some kinds of reformation era in Indonesia in 1998, after the fall of the new regime. It is also believed that social as well as political changes have significant impact to the social solidarity to change. .To obtain the research data a phenomenological method was utilized. The subjects of this research were people belonging to the Arek Community of Surabaya. The location of this research was in the old villages of the Surabaya City. A deep interview with the subjects and forum group discussion with people knowledgeable of arek Surabaya community were conducted. Based on the data obtain through interview and forum group discussion the research revealed that after the reformation, the condition of the people of Surabaya has changed. Large capital is more intense in Surabaya. In effect, many regions that were not previously economic centers were directed to become economic centers.

References

Bayertz, K. (1999). Solidarity. Kluwer Academic Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1

Derpmann, S. (2009). Solidarity and Cosmopolitanism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9150-6

Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labor of Society. Macmillan Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17729-5

Lane, M. R. (2009). Mass Mobilisation in Indonesian Politics, 1960–2001: Towards a Class Analysis. University of Wollogong.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1997). Javanese Ethics and World-View: The Javanese Idea of the Good Life. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mulder, N. (1994). Individual and Society in Java. A cultural analysis. Gajah Mada Uni­versity Press.

Munafrizal, M. (2005). Gerakan Rakyat Melawan Elite. Resist Book.

Ngadiman, A. (2008). Patterns of Javanese Rhetoric in Various Settings. Penerbit Laros.

Palmos, F. (2016). Surabaya 1945, Sakral Tanahku. Obor Indonesia Foundation.

Trinarso, Agustinus Pratisto. (2019). Nilai Egaliter Arek Suroboyo Dalam Perspektif Aksiologi Dan Kontribusinya Bagi Penguatan Budaya Lokal Di Indonesia. Gajah Mada University.

Ritzer, G. (2007). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots. Mcgrow Hill.

Ritzer, G. (2017). Teori Sosiologi. Dari Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postmodern. Pustaka Pelajar.

Pasaribu, Saut. (2012). Eight Edition Sociological Theory. Student Library.

Sholihatin, E. (2013). “Apakah Pisuhan Selalu Bermakna Negatif? Fungsi Pisuhandalam Masyarakat Arek dan Masyarakat Mataraman.” Mozaik, 13(2), 158–167.

Thijessen, P. (2012). From Mechanical to Organic Solidarity, and back with Honneth beyond Durkheim. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(4), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011423589

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Ryadi, A. (2021). Hybrid Solidarity Arek Surabaya Solidarity Shift in the Post Reformation Era in Indonesia. The Biblical and Liturgical Movement, 74(2), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.21906/rbl.3685

Issue

Section

Articles