Mark 14:58 and the “three days” motif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21906/rbl.3735Słowa kluczowe:
Gospel of Mark, Mark 14:58, three days, templeAbstrakt
Jeremias and others include the 'three days' motif in their reconstruction of Jesus's prophecy about the temple's destruction in Mark 14:58. While the arguments in the literature present a plausible case for authenticity, it is more likely an inauthentic pre-Markan innovation. Even so, its placement and form in 14:58 is surely the result of Markan redaction. In addition to arguments from redaction, literary, and structural criticism, hypothetical reconstruction of the motif's tradition history in early Christianity suggests that the addition follows a pattern of connecting Jesus's prophecy with the resurrection and growth of the Christian movement. With the designation, Mark shows how the prophecy is literally false because it misrepresents Jesus's actual teaching but is, ironically, symbolically true.
Bibliografia
Ådna J., Jesu Stellung zum Tempel, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2000 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe, 119).
Alan J. Avery-Peck, Death and Afterlife in the Early Rabbinic Sources: The Mishnah, Tosefta, and Early Midrash Compilations, [in:] Judaism in Late Antiquity, part 4: Death, Life-After-Death, Resurrection and The World-to-Come in the Judaisms of Antiquity, ed. by Alan J. Avery-Peck, Jacob Neusner, Leiden: Brill 2000, pp. 243–266, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004294141_012.
Bauer J. B., Drei Tage, „Biblica” 39 (1958) no. 3, pp. 354–358.
Biguzzi G., “Io Distruggerò questo tempio”: il tempio e il giudaismo nel vangelo di Marco, seconda edizione, Città del Vaticano: Urbaniana University Press 2008.
Bode E. L., The First Easter Morning: The Gospel Accounts of the Women’s Visit to the Tomb of Jesus, Rome: Biblical Institute Press 1970 (Analecta Biblica, 45).
Bowen C. R., The Resurrection in the New Testament, New York–London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons–The Knickerbocker Press 1911.
Breck J., The Shape of Biblical Language: Chiasmus in the Scriptures and Beyond, 2nd ed., Crestwood: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press 2008.
Brown R. E., Death of the Messiah: From Gethsemane to the Grave. A Commentary on the Passion Narratives in the Four Gospels, vol. 1, New York: Doubleday 1994.
Camery-Hoggatt J., Irony in Mark’s Gospel: Text and Subtext, Cambridge University Press 2004 (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series, 72), https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520327.
Campenhausen H. von, The Events of Easter and the Empty Tomb, [in:] Tradition and Life in the Church. Essay and Lectures in Church History, Philadelphia: Fortress Press 1968, p. 42–89.
Cavallin H. C. C., Life After Death. Paul’s Argument for the Resurrection of the Dead in 1 Cor 15, Part 1: An Enquiry into the Jewish Background, Lund: CWK Gleerup 1974, pp. 189–190, 192 (Coniectanea Biblica. New Testament Series, 7:1)
Clark D. J., After Three Days, “The Bible Translator” 30 (1979) no. 3, pp. 340–343, https://doi.org/10.1177/026009357903000306.
Conzelmann H., Auferstehung Christi I. Im NT, [in:] Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Handwörterbuch für Theologie und Religionswissenschaft, vol. 1: A–C, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1957, pp. 698–700.
Craig W. L., Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus, Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers 2023.
Day J., Resurrection Imagery from Baal to the Book of Daniel, [in:] Congress Volume Cambridge 1995, Leiden: Brill 1997, pp. 125–133 (Vetus Testamentum Supplements, 66), https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004275904_007.
Dodd C. H., The Framework of the Gospel Narrative, “The Expository Times” 43 (1932) no. 9, pp. 396–400, https://doi.org/10.1177/001452463204300903.
Donahue J. R., Are You The Christ?, New York: Society of Biblical Literature 1973 (Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series, 10).
Dschulnigg P., Sprache, Redaktion und Intention des Markus-Evangeliums: Eigentümlichkeiten der Sprache des Markus-Evangeliums und ihre Bedeutung für die Redaktionskritik, Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk 1984 (Stuttgarter Biblische Beiträge, 11).
Dunn J. D. G., Christianity in the Making, vol. 1: Jesus Remembered, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 2003.
Elgvin T., Eschatology and Messianism in the Gabriel Inscription, „Journal of the Jesus Movement in its Jewish Setting” 2014 no. 1, p. 5–25.
Elledge C. D., Resurrection of the Dead in Early Judaism 200 BCE–CE 200, Oxford University Press 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199640416.001.0001.
Elliot J. K., The Language & Style of the Gospel of Mark: An Edition of C. H. Turner’s “Notes on Marcan Usage” Together with Other Comparable Studies, Leiden–Köln: Brill 1993 (Supplements to Novum Testamentum, 71), https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004259997.
Friedrich M., Exkurz V, [in:] J. Schreiber, Der Kreuzigungsbericht des Markusevangeliums Mk 15, 20b–41, Berlin–New York: De Gruyter 1986, pp. 395–433 (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, 48).
Gaston L., Horae Synopticae Electronicae. Word Statistics of the Synoptic Gospels, New York: Society of Biblical Literature 1973 (Society of Biblical Literature Sources for Biblical Study, 3).
Geddert T. J., Watchwords: Mark 13 in Markan Eschatology, Sheffield: JSOT Press 1989 (Journal for the Study of the New Testament. Supplement Series, 26).
Gerhardsson B., Evidence for Christ’s Resurrection according to Paul: 1 Cor 15:1–11, [in:] Neotestamentica et Philonica: Studies in Honor of Peder Borgen, ed. by D. E. Aune, T. Seland, and J. H. Ulrichsen, Leiden–Boston: Brill 2003, p. 71–91 (Novum Testamentum Supplements, 106), https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004268241_004.
Hollon E. L., Frost S. M., Jesus’s Temple Prophecy in Mark 14:58, “Bibliotheca Sacra” 180 (2023) no. 718, pp. 202–227.
Hölscher G., Der Ursprung der Apokalypse Markus 13, “Theologische Blätter” 12 (1933), pp. 193–202.
Jeremias J., Die Drei-Tage-Worte der Evangelien, [in:] Tradition und Glaube: Das frühe Christentum in seiner Umwelt. Festgabe für Karl Georg Kuhn, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1971, pp. 221–229.
Juel D., Messiah and Temple. The Trial of Jesus in the Gospel of Mark, Missoula: Scholars Press 1971, p. 55 (Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series, 31).
Justnes Å., Gabriels åpenbaring (Hazon Gabriel): En modern forfalskning?, “Teologisk Tidsskrift” 4 (2015) no. 2, pp. 120–133, https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1893-0271-2015-02-02.
Klawans J., Deceptive Intentions: Forgeries, Falsehoods and the Study of Ancient Judaism, “The Jewish Quarterly Review” 108 (Fall 2018) no. 4, pp. 489–501, https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2018.0030.
Knohl I., “By Three Days, Live”: Messiahs, Resurrection, and Ascent to Heaven in Hazon Gabriel, “The Journal of Religion” 88 (April 2008) no. 2, pp. 147–158, https://doi.org/10.1086/525562.
Knohl I., The Apocalyptic and Messianic Dimensions of the Gabriel Revelation in Their Historical Context, [in:] Hazon Gabriel: New Readings of the Gabriel Revelation, ed. by M. Henze, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature 2011, pp. 39–60 (Early Judaism and its Literature, 29).
Landes G. M., The “Three Days and Three Nights” Motif in Jonah 2:1, “Journal of Biblical Literature” 86 (1967) no. 4, pp. 446–450, https://doi.org/10.2307/3262800.
Lehmann K., Auferweckt am dritten Tag nach der Schrift: Früheste Christologie, Bekenntnisbildung und Schriftauslegung im Lichte von 1 Kor. 15,3–5, Freiburg: Herder 1968, p. 184 (Quaestiones Disputatae, 38).
Létourneau P., Le quatrième évangile et les predictions de la passion dans les évangiles synoptiques, [in:] John and the Synoptics, A. Denaux, Leuven: Leuven University Press 1992 (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium, 101).
Lichtenstein E., Die älteste christliche Glaubensformel, “Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte” 63 (1950–1951), pp. 1–74, https://doi.org/10.1515/zatw.1951.63.1.74.
Lindars B., New Testament Apologetic: Study Edition, London: SCM Press 1973.
Martin-Achard R., From Death to Life: A Study of the Development of the Doctrine of the Resurrection in the Old Testament, transl. by J. P. Smith, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd 1960.
Marxsen W., Mark the Evangelist: Studies on the Redaction History of the Gospel, transl. by J. Boyce, D. Juel, W. Poehlmann with R. A. Harrisville, New York: Abingdon Press 1969.
McArthur H., On the Third Day, “New Testament Studies” 18 (1971) no. 1, p. 81–86, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002868850002350X.
McCasland S. V., The Scripture Basis of “On the Third Day”, “Journal of Biblical Literature” 48 (1929) no. 3–4, p. 124–37, https://doi.org/10.2307/3259719.
Meier J. P., A Marginal Jew, vol. 1: The Roots of the Problem and the Person, New York: Doubleday 1991.
Meyer B. F., Christus Faber: The Master-Builder & The House of God, Allison Park, Pickwick Publications 1992 (Princeton Theological Monograph Series, 29).
Meyer B. F., The Aims of Jesus, Eugene: Pickwick Publications 2002 (Princeton Theological Monograph Series, 48).
Neirynck F., Words Characteristic of Mark: A New List, “Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses” 64 (1987) no. 4, pp. 367–374, https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.63.4.556348.
Neusner J., Death and Afterlife in the Later Rabbinic Sources: The Two Talmuds and Associated Midrash-Compilations, [in:] Judaism in Late Antiquity, part 4: Death, Life-After-Death, Resurrection and The World-to-Come in the Judaisms of Antiquity, ed. by Alan J. Avery-Peck, Jacob Neusner, Leiden: Brill 2000, pp. 267–291, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004294141_013.
Nötscher F., Altorientalischer und alttestamentlicher Auferstehungsglauben, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1970.
Novakovic L., Raised from the Dead According to Scripture: The Role of Israel’s Scripture in the Early Christian Interpretation of Jesus’ Resurrection, New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark 2014 (Jewish and Christian Texts in Contexts and Related Studies, 12).
Paesler K., Das Tempelwort Jesu: Die Traditionen von Tempelzerstörung und Tempelerneuerung im Neuen Testament, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1999 (Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments, 184), https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666538681.
Perrin N., Jesus the Temple, Grand Rapids: Baker Academic 2010.
Perrin N., Towards an Interpretation of the Gospel of Mark, [in:] Christology and a Modern Pilgrimage: A Discussion with Norman Perrin, ed. by Hans Dieter Betz, Claremont: New Testament Colloquium 1971, pp. 1–78.
Proctor M., “After Three Days He Will Rise”: The (Dis)Appropriation of Hosea 6.2 in the Markan Passion Predictions, [in:] Biblical Interpretation in Early Christian Gospels, Volume 1: The Gospel of Mark, ed. by T. R. Hatina, New York: T&T Clark 2006.
Proctor M., “After Three Days” in Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:34: Subordinating Jesus’ Resurrection in the Second Gospel, “Perspectives in religious studies” 30 (2003) no. 4, pp. 399–424.
Roth W. M. W., The Numerical Sequence x/x+1 in the Old Testament, “Vetus Testamentum” 12 (1962) no. 3, p. 300–311, https://doi.org/10.2307/1516656.
Sanders E. P., Jesus and Judaism, Philadelphia: Fortress Press 1985.
Schmidt K. L., Der Rahmen Der Geschichte Jesu, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1969.
Shepherd T., The Irony of Power in the Trial of Jesus and the Denial by Peter – Mark 14:53–72, [in:] The Trial and Death of Jesus: Essays on the Passion Narrative in Mark, eds. G. van Oyen, T. Shepherd, Leuven–Dudley: Peeters 2006, pp. 229–245.
Strecker G., Die Passionsgeschichte im Markusevangelium, [in:] Bilanz und Perspektiven gegenwärtiger Auslegung des Neuen Testaments. Symposion zum 65. Geburtstag von Georg Strecker, hrsg. von F. W. Horn, Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter 1995, p. 218–247 (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, 75), https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882841-012.
Strecker G., The Passion – and Resurrection Predictions in Mark’s Gospel (Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:32–34), “Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology” 22 (1968), pp. 421–442, https://doi.org/10.1177/002096436802200403.
Taylor V., The Gospel According to St. Mark. The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes, and Indexes, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House 1981 (Thornapple Commentaries).
Theißen G., Merz A., The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide, Minneapolis: Fortress Press 1998.
Theissen G., The Gospels in Context: Social and Political History in the Synoptic Tradition, T&T Clark 1999.
Turner C. H., The Gospel According to St. Mark: Introduction and Commentary, S.P.C.K.: London 1900.
Vielhauer P., Oikodome: Aufsätze zum Neuen Testament, vol. 2, hrsg. von G. Klein, München: Kaiser Verlag 1979 (Theologische Bücherei Neues Testament, 65).
Wright N. T., Christian Origins and the Question of God, vol. 3: The Resurrection of the Son of God, Minneapolis: Fortress Press 2003.
Yardeni A., Elizur B., A Prophetic Text on Stone from the First Century BCE: First Publication, “Cathedra” 123 (2007), pp. 155–166.
Yuditsky A., Qimron E., Notes on the Inscription ‘The Vision of Gabriel’, “Cathedra” 133 (2009), pp. 133–144.
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Copyright (c) 2025 Elton Hollon
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Autorzy publikujący w czasopiśmie udzielają jego wydawcy zgody o następującej treści:
- Autor zachowuje autorskie prawa majątkowe do utworu, a jednocześnie udziela wydawcy czasopisma zgody na jego pierwszą publikację w wersji drukowanej i wersji online na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe oraz zgody na wykonywanie opracowań, w tym przekładów.
- Autor ma możliwość udzielania zgody niewyłącznej na opublikowanie utworu w wersji, która ukazała się w czasopiśmie (np. zamieszczenia go w repozytorium instytucjonalnym lub opublikowania w książce), wraz z informacją o jego pierwszej publikacji w czasopiśmie.
- Autor może umieścić swój utwór online (np. w repozytorium instytucjonalnym lub na swojej stronie internetowej) jeszcze przed zgłoszeniem utworu do czasopisma.
